SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

News > R&D

Academic: Government sodium targets are incompatible with rest of dietary guidelines

6 commentsBy Elaine Watson , 19-Jan-2012
Last updated on 19-Jan-2012 at 01:58 GMT

Further evidence that government healthy eating guidelines are more ‘aspirational’ than achievable has been uncovered by researchers testing how easy it is to meet low sodium targets and get the rest of the nutrients we need.

In ‘A Conflict Between Nutritionally Adequate Diets and Meeting the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Sodium’, Dr Matthieu Maillot and Dr Adam Drewnowski reveal that meeting targets for sodium and complying with the rest of the 2010 dietary guidelines is impossible without wholesale changes to eating patterns.

A fundamental conflict between very low sodium guidelines and a nutritionally sound diet

The article, published online ahead of print in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, highlights a “fundamental conflict between the very low sodium guidelines and a nutritionally sound diet”, Drewnowski told FoodNavigator-USA.

The authors used federal nutrient composition and dietary intake databases to create modeled food patterns for people of different ages and genders using linear programming techniques. The patterns were designed to meet nutritional standards for 27 nutrients as the mean sodium content was progressively reduced to the target 1500 mg/day.

The goal was to determine at what point the 1500mg/day target would begin to interfere with the model’s ability to create food patterns that met adequacy standards for 27 nutrients, explained Drewnowsk, who is director of the Center for Public Health Nutrition at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Should dietary guidelines be viewed as merely ‘aspirational’?

The results quickly debunked the myth that simply maintaining your current eating patterns but switching to lower-sodium versions of your favorite foods would be enough to meet the 1500mg target, he said.

“Many people think that they will simply eat lower sodium version of the foods they eat and continue to get the nutrients they need.”

But in reality, he said, the only way to achieve this was to switch to a diet that was so far removed from what Americans actually eat as to make the sodium targets merely ‘aspirational’.

“The nutrient-adequate food patterns that were achievable at lower levels of sodium were ‘fructivore’ diets, largely composed of fruit juices, nuts, and seeds. By contrast, meats and grains were totally absent from the modeled food patterns because of their sodium content, as were many vegetables.”

A major reformulation of the American food supply

He said: “At very low levels of sodium (1500mg/d), there is no way to get adequate nutrition. For young men, the goal is simply not feasible - there is no theoretical solution possible. For older men, the goal can be achieved - at least in theory - but may be difficult in practice.

“Women, young and old, were better able to meet the sodium guidelines without sacrificing adequate nutrition - but at the cost of altering eating habits.

“So there are two options - a wrenching change in dietary patterns where whole groups of foods are removed from the diet and/or a major reformulation of the American food supply.

He added: “There is a third option. The guidelines can be viewed as merely ‘aspirational’.”

‘Wrenching deviations from existing eating behaviors’

The 2010 Dietary Guidelines advised Americans to reduce daily sodium intake to less than 2300 mg/day, with a lower goal of 1500 mg/day for people who were aged 51+, all African-Americans and anyone with hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease.

The study is the fırst feasibility analysis of sodium goals based on linear programming, claim the authors. “The shape of the linear programming objective function can usefully pinpoint when modeled food patterns begin to depart from existing diets.

“At that point, substitutions within food groups are no longer suffıcient to meet nutrient goals, so that shifts across food groups must be made.

“For example, the 2300-mg/day sodium target could be achieved by most age– gender groups by selecting lower-sodium options within each major food group.

“However, linear programming modeling showed that sodium levels in the 1500–2000-mg/day range were associated with wrenching deviations from existing eating behaviors.

“For age– gender groups including people aged 50 years, the proposed sodium goal of 1500 mg/day was incompatible with nutrient-adequate diets.”

Source: American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012;42(2):174 –179) published online ahead of print

‘A Conflict Between Nutritionally Adequate Diets and Meeting the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Sodium.’

Authors: Matthieu Maillot, PhD, Adam Drewnowski, PhD

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

6 comments (Comments are now closed)

wrenching?

If "wrenching" means encouraging people to eat fruit, vegetables, non-smoked/cured meats and dairy products, and unprocessed grain foods, instead of low sodium Doritos and hotdogs, then yes, wrenching change is required.

Report abuse

Posted by Paul O'Black
20 January 2012 | 17h34

The whole point is that we should change

I could re-write whtat Dick Logue posted before, but I think he expressed very well the thoughts of any intelligent person.

Report abuse

Posted by AP
20 January 2012 | 17h05

A few thoughts from someone who has done it

As someone who has been following a 1500 mg a day diet for 13 years I can say that it is possible. There were a couple of things that struck me about this. First is the implication that people needing to change their eating habits is a bad thing. I thought that was the goal of the guidelines, to show people that they AREN'T eating the right things. If we were we wouldn't have the amount of obesity, heart and kidney disease and other medical problems that we do. The second is the apparent belief that meats and grains must be eliminated to achieve a 1500 mg per day level. As Diane pointed out grains are naturally low in sodium (unless of course you are buying the 1100 mg per serving box of Rice-A-Roni). And while meats and dairy foods do contain natural sodium, it is not in a quantity to be an issue in and of itself. You could eat 4 ounces each of extra lean beef, chicken and salmon, plus 2 cups of milk and 2 ounces of Swiss cheese and it would total just over 500 mg of sodium, while providing almost twice the RDA of protein for everyone except pregnant or nursing women. The problem again is finding and choosing the natural products. Most chicken these days is "enhanced" with a solution that is essentially salt water to make it more juicy, while raising the sodium level per serving from the natural level of around 75 mg to more than 300 mg in most cases. (By the way, you are also paying meat prices for the weight of that "broth".)

Report abuse

Posted by Dick Logue
20 January 2012 | 16h18

Read all comments (6)

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...