Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

News > Regulation

Comment

Time to embrace balanced kids’ marketing regulation

4 commentsBy Caroline Scott-Thomas , 13-Sep-2010

Kids are not going to stop liking chocolate, pizza, ice cream, or fries. Heck, neither am I. So why is industry so afraid of mandatory restrictions on marketing to children?

The obvious reason is money. If you market brightly colored sugary cereals, for example, by covering the packaging with kids’ favorite cartoon characters and placing ads during kids’ favorite television programs, you’ve got a better chance of profitability than if you market them to adults.

But this approach is damaging the food industry. Consumers are beginning to wonder whether there might be something deeply unethical about creating high-sugar, high-fat, high-sodium products and then trying to attract (increasingly overweight) kids by associating them with all they love best.

Self-regulation in action

It must be said that industry has made enormous strides in recent years to restrict its advertising of unhealthy foods to children but marketers still have a long way to go.

In Europe, the EU Pledge aims to curb marketing of high-fat, high-salt and high-sugar products to children and represents over half of the European food industry’s advertising spend. It was set up in response to a 2005 threat of EU-wide legislation.

In the United States, the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative was set up in 2006 after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a probe investigating industry’s marketing to kids. It has a similar aim to the EU Pledge, but represents much less of the market, even though it counts some of the largest food and beverage manufacturers in the US among its members. Both schemes have faced criticism for not having strict enough standards.

Tackling skepticism

That’s where government regulation could help. Although the packaged foods industry has consistently pushed for a purely self-regulatory approach to its advertising practices, better independent oversight could help consumer perception of an industry that’s viewed with growing skepticism.

This isn’t about government telling people what to feed their kids – it’s about giving that role back to parents and taking it away from talking cartoon animals.

Last week, a report conducted for the EU Pledge found that there has been a dramatic decline in the number of commercials advertising unhealthy foods and drinks to kids in Europe – but the greatest success has been in countries where self-regulation works together with government intervention.

In the UK, for example, kids’ exposure to advertising for unhealthy foods has plummeted since its advertising watchdog, Ofcom, banned high-fat, high-salt and high-sugar foods from appearing during TV programs designed to appeal to children in 2007.

Meanwhile in the US, the Federal Trade Commission is again seeking information from major food and beverage companies about the effectiveness of voluntary guidelines. We will wait and see how successful industry self-regulation has been in the United States; and my guess is that there have been some significant improvements, as industry strives to dodge legislation.

Mixed messages

However, many food and beverage manufacturers continue to put out mixed messages.

On the one hand, there has been vociferous support for Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move campaign to fight childhood obesity. On the other, there is steadfast resistance to any government-led initiatives to restrict marketing of junk foods to children. Public trust in the packaged food industry is already low and this kind of confusion doesn’t help.

It’s time to embrace government intervention alongside other initiatives.

Industry needs to stop trying to have its cake and market it to kids too.

Caroline Scott-Thomas is a journalist specializing in the food industry. Prior to completing a Masters degree in journalism at Edinburgh's Napier University, she had spent five years working as a chef.

4 comments (Comments are now closed)

Beautiful

The food marketers love to say it's a parent's choice whether to purchase or not purchase. But, as a father of 4, it is much more difficult when you have to compete with a barrage of sophisticated marketing techniques and messages, developed by highly-trained, psychologically astute marketers. Time to force changes!

Report abuse

Posted by General Healthy
14 September 2010 | 14h08

Industry Codes can work!

In Australia the food industry has introduced an effective industry code restricting the direct marketing of some foods to children. The Responsible Childrens Marketing Initiative has been running for almost 2 years and initial reports suggest it has reduced the exposure of children to marketing of some classes of food products.
Of course it doesn't mean that children never see an advertisement for a bar of chocolate. But hey - I'm 55 years old, and can still remember the Milky Bar jingle from the 1960s - and I'm still going strong (touch wood).

Report abuse

Posted by Geoffrey Annison
14 September 2010 | 01h22

More regulation is the last thing we need

The U.S., with 300 million people, already has more food regulation than communist China with 1.3 BILLION people... yet you propse even MORE regulation as the answer. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so dangerous.

The "food regulators" have, and will continue, to do what the most powerful lobbying groups influence them to do. And what protects their jobs. If you don't believe this you need to check your history. The herb stevia was stymied in the U.S. for 70 years while sugar was pushed on the populace. How many people do you suppose died unnecessarily from diabetes-related illnesses during this time?

This is just one example. Food regulations have also deemed California almonds unhealthy unless they are subjected to heat, which kills much of the beneficial nutrients; they have caused raw milk producers to be arrested in favor of the dairy industry's pasteurized product; and they have prevented the VOLUNTARY labeling of antibiotic-free meat (because the beef industry didn't want it!) This is how government regulation works. I could go on all day with one expample after another.

Perhaps you have not read it, but the latest studies show that our federal health experts have now put 1 million U.S. children on ADHD drugs unnecessarily--at the same time they are limiting, almost daily, our children's access to nutritional supplements. And these are the same people you deem qualified to decide what kind of nutritional marketing is appropriate for our children? Please re-think your position!

The populace needs more education not more regulation.

Report abuse

Posted by Russell Cox
13 September 2010 | 23h56

Read all comments (4)

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...