Whether the food industry likes it or not, when it comes to GMO labeling, the “train appears...
|
Dannon, General Mills and Cabot have emerged victorious in a legal wrangle over the definition of ‘yogurt’...
|
New research supports significant reductions in sodium from where most Americans are today, but does not justify...
|
The percentage of energy derived from snacks in the American diet has increased from 12% in the...
|
Tony Vernon, CEO of Kraft Foods Inc., says the company will ramp up its revitalizing of iconic...
|
The price differential between Hain Celestial’s brands and mainstream grocery brands will close over time as the...
|
Drug stores, club stores and the foodservice market could be the next big areas of opportunity for...
|
uneducated public?
Consumers will be confused with the GMO info? Is this a unintended comment on our school systems? The same systems that produced AMA members? Back to the real issue--with the allergy concerns I have, I am a constant label-reader. But that does me no good if the labels don't give me the information I need to make an educated choice. With all the questions swirling around the safety/risk of GMOs, wouldn't the wisest course of action be to err on the side of caution and wait until time has given enough evidence to support the safety claims? This could be accomplished by conducting a longitudinal study with people eating GMO food as the experimental group, and people eating non-GMO food as a control group. But this would require time, which would hit a lot of bottom lines....
In the meantime, I deserve the right to make my own choice!!!!
Posted by lm
25 June 2012 | 14h44