Dannon, General Mills and Cabot have emerged victorious in a legal wrangle over the definition of ‘yogurt’...
|
New research supports significant reductions in sodium from where most Americans are today, but does not justify...
|
The percentage of energy derived from snacks in the American diet has increased from 12% in the...
|
Tony Vernon, CEO of Kraft Foods Inc., says the company will ramp up its revitalizing of iconic...
|
The price differential between Hain Celestial’s brands and mainstream grocery brands will close over time as the...
|
Drug stores, club stores and the foodservice market could be the next big areas of opportunity for...
|
Luddities & GMO Food Labeling
IFIC is right, there is no nutritional or food safety reason to label. For more information read: http://bit.ly/SP0uod
The food industry has been polling consumers on what they want on food packages before the Nutrition Facts Box arrived. In short, they want everything under the sun. Whether they understand anything is the question since a warninhg about everything, is a warning about nothing and consumers become braindead when real warnings are issued.
Legislation by Proposition is part of California democracy. But this is not a 'right to know" bill; rather, it is a bounty hunter's full employment act.
Posted by Jeff Nedelman
06 August 2012 | 17h35