SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

Report abuse about a comment

reply to "GMO is NOT Equivalent to natural food"

"What is done to the genome of these plants has been called "genetic pollution" by scientists, in spite of how "safe" the companies that sell it claim them to be.

Some scientists are the ones making these alterations... You drastically misunderstand genetics. Natural breeding with always cause gene flow and loss. There will always be viruses that can transfer genes to organisms, and insert themselves into the genome of host species. It doesn't matter if some scientists call it genetic pollution, what it is is genetic engineering.

"It produces thousands of potentially toxic effects, including sterility, birth defects, autoimmune disease, etc."

Please show me such? Potentially toxic effects like what? Where is the sterility you talk about, the birth defects and autoimmune disease. Every GMO is NOT the same. Different techniques are used for each, and different genes are insert. Some can be from the same species just different varieties, and some can be from different plant species in the same genus, some in the same family, or some completely different. There can be insertions from bacteria, and there can we ones from animals. Every insertion is different, and that why every gmo is individually accessed. These foods go through more scrutiny than any hybrid crop or plant out there. They also have a mandatory testing for all of the 500 known allergens... which is not mandatory for any non engineered food.

"And don't forget, the largest company involved in genetic modification of your food is also one of the world's largest pesticide and poison manufacturers."

No coincidence. It is an agriculture based company, it makes sense they would diversify out into other areas of agriculture business. Is there any coincidence that the companies that stand to profit the most from this bill are financing it?

Fear of science is not the way. Fear of science gets you backwards societies with disease, dogma, and lower standards of living. With our ever increasing population does it make any sense to not try to improve the crops we grow. To engineer things like increased nutrients? Or herbicide resistance, or an insecticide? Make it so we don't have to spray the pesticides? Why not reduce crop losses?

Also, poison manufacturer? WTF? You do realize pesticides are a fact of life. Do you have any idea what insects, fungi, and weeds and do to world crops? If a crop doesn't have a resistant gene, and none of the genus or species that can form hybrids have a resistance gene, what then? With global warming we are seeing more and more invasive species range extensions, as the climates are becoming more hospitable to these invasive species.



Posted by reedbarnes
07 August 2012 | 19h11

Please fill in the box below to tell us why you feel the post breaks our rules. When you are finished, click on "Send" so that it can be reviewed by a moderator.

Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

Reason *

Back to: Food industry raises millions to oppose Prop 37 on GMO labeling

Spotlight

FNCE 2014 highlights part 1: Protein red hot, fermentation on fire

FNCE 2014 highlights part one: Protein still red hot, fermentation on fire, and why self-discipline won’t defeat obesity

We’ve never had access to more information about how to get healthy. So why are two thirds...

FNCE 2014 highlights part two: RDIs based on your genotype? Hummus 2.0

FNCE 2014 highlights part two: RDIs based on your genotype? Hummus 2.0, Nutrition Facts in transition, & a metagenomic MyPlate?

FoodNavigator-USA brings you part two of our gallery of highlights from the 2014 Food & Nutrition Conference...

‘Robust evidence’ supports oat beta-glucan’s cholesterol-lowering potential

‘Robust evidence’ supports oat beta-glucan’s cholesterol-lowering potential

Daily consumption of at least 3 grams of oat beta-glucan may reduce cholesterol levels, with greater effects...

AquaBall CEO: We have the ability to have 5% of the kids beverage market within 18 months

AquaBall CEO: We have the ability to have 5% of the kids beverage market within 18 months

After 18 months of rapid growth and a summer of reflection, True Drinks is ready to accelerate...

Time for the DGAC to look again at choline?

90% of Americans don't get enough choline. So why isn't it higher up the food policy agenda?

As the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans are developed, there has been a lot of heated debate...

Sprouted seeds! The meteoric rise of Way Better Snacks
Consumers want to see what you are putting into the product as well as what isn’t in there

The meteoric rise of Way Better Snacks: ‘All-natural’ is all very well, but what really matters is nutrient density

With revenues going from zero to “north of $20m” in three years, the growth of Way Better...

Eat Well Embrace Life: 'We want to be the Chobani of hummus'
US hummus category could break $1bn barrier in a few years

Eat Well Embrace Life: 'Suddenly beans went from boring to exciting... We want to be the Chobani of hummus'

US sales of hummus have almost doubled since 2009 to top $600m, but could easily break through...

Evolva on synthetic biology: Its faster, cheaper & more sustainable.
Interview: Neil Goldsmith, CEO, Evolva

Synthetic biology is cheaper, faster, and more sustainable, says Evolva CEO: 'We’re proud of what we do'

What’s more sustainable? Using acres of land, water and energy to grow plants that produce minuscule quantities...

Beanitos on beans, healthy snacking and explosive growth

Beanitos: People aren’t against calories, they are against empty calories

Not so long ago, beans were something you’d more likely find in a dip than a chip....

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...