SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

Report abuse about a comment

reply to "GMO is NOT Equivalent to natural food"

"What is done to the genome of these plants has been called "genetic pollution" by scientists, in spite of how "safe" the companies that sell it claim them to be.

Some scientists are the ones making these alterations... You drastically misunderstand genetics. Natural breeding with always cause gene flow and loss. There will always be viruses that can transfer genes to organisms, and insert themselves into the genome of host species. It doesn't matter if some scientists call it genetic pollution, what it is is genetic engineering.

"It produces thousands of potentially toxic effects, including sterility, birth defects, autoimmune disease, etc."

Please show me such? Potentially toxic effects like what? Where is the sterility you talk about, the birth defects and autoimmune disease. Every GMO is NOT the same. Different techniques are used for each, and different genes are insert. Some can be from the same species just different varieties, and some can be from different plant species in the same genus, some in the same family, or some completely different. There can be insertions from bacteria, and there can we ones from animals. Every insertion is different, and that why every gmo is individually accessed. These foods go through more scrutiny than any hybrid crop or plant out there. They also have a mandatory testing for all of the 500 known allergens... which is not mandatory for any non engineered food.

"And don't forget, the largest company involved in genetic modification of your food is also one of the world's largest pesticide and poison manufacturers."

No coincidence. It is an agriculture based company, it makes sense they would diversify out into other areas of agriculture business. Is there any coincidence that the companies that stand to profit the most from this bill are financing it?

Fear of science is not the way. Fear of science gets you backwards societies with disease, dogma, and lower standards of living. With our ever increasing population does it make any sense to not try to improve the crops we grow. To engineer things like increased nutrients? Or herbicide resistance, or an insecticide? Make it so we don't have to spray the pesticides? Why not reduce crop losses?

Also, poison manufacturer? WTF? You do realize pesticides are a fact of life. Do you have any idea what insects, fungi, and weeds and do to world crops? If a crop doesn't have a resistant gene, and none of the genus or species that can form hybrids have a resistance gene, what then? With global warming we are seeing more and more invasive species range extensions, as the climates are becoming more hospitable to these invasive species.



Posted by reedbarnes
07 August 2012 | 19h11

Please fill in the box below to tell us why you feel the post breaks our rules. When you are finished, click on "Send" so that it can be reviewed by a moderator.

Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

Reason *

Back to: Food industry raises millions to oppose Prop 37 on GMO labeling

Spotlight

Is sodium reduction falling down the food policy agenda?
Special edition: Sodium reduction

Is sodium reduction falling down the food policy agenda?

Four years ago sodium was public enemy #1. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) was calling for the...

The gluten-free diet “fad” may be unsustainable

The gluten-free diet “fad” may be unsustainable

The increasing number of U.S. adults reducing or eliminating gluten from their diet who are not diagnosed...

Rhythm Superfood CEO worries if kale will jump shark in natural stores

Will kale jump the shark? Rhythm Superfoods CEO says no, but expects “shaking out”

While kale chips have a lot of growth potential in conventional food stores, Rhythm Superfoods CEO Scott...

Trade spending, the elephant in the boardroom?

Trade spending: The elephant in the boardroom?

Tune into an earnings call from a big consumer packaged goods (CPG) company, and you’ll likely hear...

Legal reaction to Unilever vs Hampton Creek Just Mayo lawsuit
'Hampton Creek is up against a well-financed plaintiff'

Unilever vs Hampton Creek case will hinge upon what a ‘reasonable consumer’ thinks Just Mayo is, say attorneys

While Unilever’s lawsuit against Hampton Creek Foods has generated a lively debate about corporate bullying, industrialized egg production,...

Senomyx finds natural sweeteners more potent than Reb A stevia

Senomyx: ‘We have identified natural sweeteners that are more potent than Rebaudioside A’

Senomyx has identified novel natural sweeteners “that are more potent than Rebaudioside A [the best-known sweetening component...

Smartphone use among 5 key trends driving interest in healthy eating
Oldways Whole Grains Breaking Barriers Conference

Smartphone use among 5 key trends driving interest in healthy eating

Unprecedented access to information about foods through smart phones and social media is a driving factor in...

Tate & Lyle Q2: Sucralose prices still completely unrealistic

Tate & Lyle: We cannot see how we - or frankly anyone else - can make any money out of sucralose at these prices

Up until relatively recently, sucralose was a key profit driver at Tate & Lyle. But as the...

FDA rejects two citizen petitions calling for aspartame ban

FDA rejects calls for aspartame ban: ‘No new credible scientific evidence has been presented’

The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has rejected two citizen’s petitions urging it to ban the...

Whole Foods lowers prices to ditch 'whole paycheck' nickname

Whole Foods tries to ditch “whole paycheck” nickname with lower prices, added perks

Whole Foods Market hopes to ditch its unwanted moniker “whole paycheck” and reinvigorate slowing sales by lowering...

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...