Energy drinks and shots
Fancy Food Show
Dietary Guidelines 2015
What do you do?
Food labeling and marketing
The obesity problem
The GM debate
Trans- and saturated fats
Health & Wellness
Carbohydrates and fibers (sugar, starches)
Cereals and bakery preparations
Chocolate and confectionery ingredients
Cultures, enzymes, yeast
Emulsifiers, stabilizers, hydrocolloids
Fats & oils
Flavors and colors
Food safety and labeling
Fruit, vegetable, nut ingredients
Health and nutritional ingredients
Meat, fish and savory ingredients
Preservatives and acidulants
Sweeteners (intense, bulk, polyols)
Videos & Audio
Food Jobs - USA
Food Jobs - Europe
Food Jobs - UK
I feel as if someone needs to respond to all these negative comments regarding this article. First off, I'd like to see any credentials whatsoever coming from the people claiming Dr. Gaesser doesn't know what he's saying. Just because his findings differ from your fad diet, doesn't make him wrong.
This doesn't surprise me, when they tacked "Fat Free!" on products people began purchasing them blindly, failing to notice the added sugars used to compensate for the missing fat flavor, when they started tacking "Cholesterol Free!" on, again people bought it. And in both cases, it was simply a food fad. Fat has been shown, even saturated fats, to only primarily have a negative impact due to its high calories per gram. Food cholesterol has been found to be completely unrelated to blood cholesterol. And so it's no surprise to see another food fad finally having the spotlight shined on it.
Why do people feel better when they switch to it? Because they're finally consciously making food choices, not because it's necessarily better, more likely than not any positive results people may claim are results of taking this placebo food. And Miley Cyrus claiming it had all those benefits? Yes! Of course it'll have those if you're intolerant of the normal foods, but for the rest of us, cheap, solid wheat works fine.
And to you "natural" food people out there, the only reason you don't see ingredients with "names you can't pronounce" on gluten-free products yet is because they're not in high enough demand to be mass produced and preserved. Making the blanket statement that anything you can't pronounced is bad is probably the most ridiculous thing you can do, because if that becomes mainsteam, guess what, they'll come up with a name that's easy to be pronounced, check out MSG, plenty of fun names to make it "pronounceable."
I applaud this doctor for being a pioneer in shooting down a diet fad before it manages to get out the gates.
Posted by Daniel07 September 2012 | 05h36
Please fill in the box below to tell us why you feel the post breaks our rules. When you are finished, click on "Send" so that it can be reviewed by a moderator.
We will not publish your email on the site
Back to: ‘No evidence’ that gluten-free diet benefits general population, says researcher
Going non-GMO Forum 2015
Probiota Americas 2015
Food Vision USA 2015
Chicago / Conference
Subscribe to our FREE newsletterSUBSCRIBE
Industrial Baking & Snacks
Beverage Technology & Markets
Confectionery & Biscuit Processing
Dairy Processing & Markets
Food Marketing and Retailing
Food & Beverage Development - Europe
Food and Beverage Processing and Packaging
Food Safety & Quality Control
Supplements & Nutrition - Europe
Supplements & Nutrition - North America
Breaking News on the Food and Drink Manufacturing Sector
Food, Beverage & Supplement Development - Asia Pacific
Global Trading and Meat Processing
About us | Site map |
© William Reed Business Media SAS 2015, All rights reserved.