Bill requires mandatory GMO labeling but would not require front of pack ‘warning’ statements

Sen. Merkley introduces new GMO labeling bill backed by Campbell Soup, Amy's Kitchen, but critics say it “can’t pass”

By Elaine Watson contact

- Last updated on GMT

Senator Jeff Merkley: "This legislation provides the common-sense pathway forward.”
Senator Jeff Merkley: "This legislation provides the common-sense pathway forward.”

Related tags: Gmo labeling, Mandatory gmo labeling, United states senate

Two days after Senator Pat Roberts’ voluntary GMO labeling bill got the green light from the Senate agriculture committee, Senator Jeff Merkley* (D-OR) has introduced a ‘common-sense’ alternative he claims will please supporters of mandatory GMO labeling, but offer the food industry a more palatable means of presenting this information.

The Biotechnology Food Labeling and Uniformity Act,​ which has the backing of selected food companies including Amy’s Kitchen, Ben and Jerry’s, Campbell Soup and Nature’s Path - would trump all state-led GMO labeling laws, including the one about to come into effect in Vermont on July 1.

And while it would require mandatory GMO labeling on the back of pack, it would not require front of pack disclosures or ‘warning’ statements intending to disparage GM ingredients, stressed Merkley.

Campbell Soup's VP government affairs Kelly D. Johnston welcomed the bill, which was co-sponsored by Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Jon Tester (D-MT), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).

Johnston added: “The legislation reflects Campbell’s support for mandatory national standards for labeling of foods made with GMOs​. We applaud Senator Jeff Merkley and his colleagues for responding to consumers’ desire for the information they seek in a consistent and transparent manner.”

The four labeling options suggested in Sen Merkley's bill are:  

  1. Manufacturers can insert the phrase genetically engineered’​ in parenthesis after any GE ingredients on the ingredients list.
  2. Manufacturers can identify GM ingredients with an asterisk​ and provide an explanation at the bottom of the ingredients list.
  3. Manufacturers may apply a catch-all statement​ at the end of the ingredient list stating the product was “produced with genetic engineering.​”
  4. The FDA could develop a symbol​, in consultation with food manufacturers, that would show presence of GM ingredients on packaging.

Exemptions are made for foods made with GE processing aids or enzymes; milk/meat from animals given GE vaccines; plus processed foods where the GE ingredient level is lower than 0.9% by weight.

senator jeff-merkley cropped

“Rather than blocking consumers’ access to information they want, the U.S. Senate should move forward with a solution that works for businesses and consumers alike. There is a way to give consumers the information they are asking for without placing unfair or conflicting requirements on food producers.

This legislation provides the common-sense pathway forward​.”

Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR)

CFSAF: ‘It can’t pass, period’

However, the food industry-backed Coalition for Safe Affordable Food (CFSAF), which is supporting Senator Roberts' voluntary GMO labeling bill,​ dismissed Sen Merkley’s bill as unworkable.

A spokeswoman told FoodNavigator-USA: ​“This is another mandatory labeling solution in search of a non-existent problem. Mandatory on package labeling is reserved for important health and safety information or to distinguish material difference in products; this doesn’t apply to biotech labeling because the overwhelming scientific consensus shows that GMOs are completely safe.

“Both the Senate and the House have already voted down mandatory on pack labeling with large bipartisan majorities. It can’t pass, period.”

While Senator Roberts' voluntary federal GMO labeling bill​ gained the support of three democrats (Amy Klobuchar, Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Donnelly) at the ag cttee vote earlier this week, many commentators predict it will struggle to get the support of the 60 senators needed to pass. (Even if all 56 Republicans vote in favor, six Democrats would still need to give it the thumbs up.)

coalition over GMO labeling logo

“Mandatory on pack labeling for GMOs would be a significant break from established labeling precedent and listing this information on the package... would lead consumers to conclude that this ingredient has health or safety risks and should be avoided. Anti-GMO activists have declared they will use labels such as this to drive biotechnology from the marketplace, the result of which will be higher grocery bills for consumers. Senator Merkley’s proposal would end up stigmatizing a technology the farmers he represents rely on."

The Coalition for Safe, Affordable Food

*Senator Merkley is the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, on which Senators Tester, Leahy and Feinstein also serve. Leahy is also a former Chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee.

Related news

Show more

3 comments

Okay...

Posted by Me,

So what symbol are they going to create for "doused in pesticid"?

Report abuse

Ah...

Posted by Dude,

If non-gmo food becomes mainstream, that will drive down the cost of non-gmo foods. If Europe can do so can we.

Report abuse

Yeah

Posted by Mar,

"Overwhelming scientific concensus that show GMOs are completely safe." I don't think anyone told that to the lab rats dying of cancer from it.

Report abuse

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars