Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

News > Manufacturers

Read more breaking news



So Häagen-Dazs ‘says no to synbio’?

1 comment

By Elaine Watson+

Last updated on 05-Sep-2014 at 07:28 GMT

When it comes to reporting the position of some of the world’s biggest food companies on genetically engineered foods, Friends of the Earth, it seems, has been engaging in some pretty creative PR ‘engineering’ of its own.

Now asking a company a question, getting the answer and using this as the hook for a press release that supports your 'narrative' is standard practice in PR, but FOE's creative interpretation of some pretty innocuous company statements in order to keep the momentum going in its anti-GMO campaign takes this to a whole new level.

Not content to quote the scores of companies that actually are, very publicly, opposed to genetically engineered foods, FOE is now on a mission to persuade us that even companies that are not opposed, or have not expressed a view, are in fact changing their minds (they just don't know it yet).

McDonald's, Gerber say no to GMO apple?

Its creative approach first came to our attention just before Christmas, in the form of a press release entitled McDonald's, Gerber say no to GMO apple, which reported that the two food giants had spurned genetically engineered ‘non-browning’ Arctic apples  and was hailed as “further proof that the market is rejecting GMOs”.

A brief glance at the letters from Nestlé and McDonald’s which prompted this widely shared piece of ‘news’ however, suggested FOE’s interpretation of the companies' statements was at best, rather cheeky.

While it had no plans to use Arctic apples in Gerber fruit purees (said Nestlé in response to a direct question from FOE), ingredients from GM crops were used in several Gerber products, and Nestlé was not, in fact, opposed to GM crops, which it noted had been determined by the FDA to be “safe and nutritionally equivalent to traditional crops ”.   

McDonald’s, meanwhile, made no reference to the merits or otherwise of GM crops (ingredients from which are used in many of its products), and simply stated (in response to the FOE question) that it had no “current plans” to buy said apples - which were not in any case available for purchase.

Now there could be a multitude of reasons why Arctic apples won’t appear in Gerber purees or McDonald’s fruit pies any time soon, but to seize upon these letters as “further proof” of anything other than the fact that these firms might just be content with their existing apple suppliers for the time being seems like a bit of a stretch.

‘Häagen-Dazs says no to synbio’

A press release issued by Friends of the Earth this week is an even more impressive example of its creative approach, meanwhile.

Once again, it started with a letter. FOE had asked Häagen-Dazs if it planned to use vanillin produced via a fermentation process* from a baker's yeast developed by Evolva and IFF  - which is due to hit the market shortly as a better-tasting and more sustainable alternative to synthetic vanillin products made from petrochemicals or chemically treated paper pulp.

No, responded Häagen-Dazs in a one sentence statement, we’ve got no plans to use said ingredient.

Seizing upon this fact (which was not accompanied by any comment on the merits or otherwise of synthetic biology), FOE immediately issued a press release - Häagen-Dazs says no to synbio’  - which praised the brand for “listening to the growing number of consumers who don’t want synbio vanilla and other extreme GMOs in their foods”.

What it omitted to mention is that Häagen-Dazs doesn’t actually use vanillin in its vanilla ice cream - it uses Madagascan natural vanilla extract, which by definition  must come from vanilla beans - so its promise not to use ‘synbio’ vanillin, is, well, kind of moot.

But that doesn’t make for quite such an appealing headline...

*The baker's yeast in question is cultured in fermentation tanks using non-GM sugars as feedstock to produce vanillin and other vanilla flavor components, says Evolva, which expects its vanillin products to compete with synthetic vanillin, which is currently used in the overwhelming majority of vanilla-flavored products because vanilla from seed pods of vanilla orchids is scarce and expensive.
The yeast itself has been 'genetically engineered' in that a handful of plant genes have been added to the 5,000+ already in its genome, but it is used as a processing aid, and is not present in the final product, says Evolva.
"The tweaked yeast is a processing aid that is removed like other processing aids [and as such the vanillin it produces would not be subject to GMO labeling]. We’re adding just a few plant genes to the 5,000+ that comprise the baker’s yeast genome. These extra plant genes are real, not 'fake', not created from a '3D printer'.
So what is the regulatory status of Evolva's vanillin, and is it 'natural'?
Says Evolva: "For most markets, our vanillin can be labeled as a natural flavor as part of a flavoring solution. If it is sold as an ingredient, it can be labeled as natural vanillin in most major markets where this ingredient is approved and labeled in consumer products, depending on how it is used; it is approved on all major flavor listings, including FEMA, CODEX, IOFI, JECFA, EU Union List, etc. as a legally approved flavoring substance."

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

1 comment

Freind of the Earth's Misinformation Campaign

So pleased to see someone finally unveil the misinformation campaign run by Friends of the Earth. As a former member and campaigner for this group I am amazed at how much misinformation they generate to support cash-cow campaigns. When will consumers learn to challenge all information that comes from these supposedly 'environmental' organisations? One does not have to dig very deep to find the facts and reveal the carefully construed lies.

Report abuse

Posted by Muffy Koch
05 September 2014 | 18h40

Related products

Key Industry Events


Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...