Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

News > Regulation

News in brief

Attorney: First round to POM at the Supreme Court, but don't expect the floodgates to open...

Jeffrey Brown: POM still has to prove its case in the district courts, and it won't be easy
Jeffrey Brown: POM still has to prove its case in the district courts, and it won't be easy

POM Wonderful scored a big win on Thursday after the Supreme Court gave it the green light to sue juice rival Coca-Cola for false advertising. But don't expect the floodgates to open with scores of similar lawsuits, says one attorney.

Jeffrey Brown, a partner in the Chicago office of law firm Michael Best & Friedrich, told FoodNavigator-USA: "POM's case against Coca-Cola was originally filed in 2008. It's now 2014, and it's not even over yet.

"Now the case [POM alleges Coke misled consumers by marketing a Minute Maid juice comprised almost entirely of apple and grape juice as ‘Pomegranate Blueberry'] will go back to the district courts, where POM will still have to prove its case, and that won't be easy. 

"POM has to prove not just that the label was misleading, but to prove injury, which resulted in damage to POM, so there is still a long way to go here."

These cases are extremely expensive and time consuming

He added: "These cases [where competitors sue each other under the Lanham Act alleging false advertising] are extremely expensive and time consuming. And there is always the element of tit for tat. If you sue a rival, they might sue you. 

"Most of them are addressed with letter writing campaigns or resolved through the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, and I don't really see that changing. This [Supreme Court opinion] is good news for POM but I don't see the floodgates opening."

As to the broader implications of the Supreme Court opinion on juice labeling in particular, it all depends on whether POM ultimately prevails, which is by no means obvious, he said.

In the meantime, companies should already be thinking about whether their labels are false or misleading in their entirety, aside from whether they are strictly compliant with juice labeling regs in the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, he said, so if they are already doing that, "this doesn't really change the landscape."

Click HERE and HERE to get more legal reaction to the Supreme Court opinion.


The Minute Maid 'Pomegranate Blueberry' juice at the center of this legal spat contains 0.3% pomegranate juice, 0.2% blueberry juice, 0.1% raspberry juice, and 99.4% apple & grape juice

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Related products