Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - North AmericaEU edition | Asian edition

News > Regulation

Should the definition of ‘whole grains’ be expanded to include whole seeds, beans and legumes?

3 comments

By Elaine Watson+

06-Dec-2013

Dan Best: 'It is in the public interest to promote consumption of whole seeds…all whole seeds… versus refined or otherwise fractionated seeds'
Dan Best: 'It is in the public interest to promote consumption of whole seeds…all whole seeds… versus refined or otherwise fractionated seeds'

As the FDA prepares to conduct consumer research into whole grain labeling statements before it issues finalized guidance for industry, the debate over precisely what should constitute a ‘whole grain’, as well as how the amount of whole grain should be disclosed, continues to rage.

The FDA issued draft guidance (click here ) on whole grain labeling statements in 2006, but has yet to issue a finalized version, telling FoodNavigator-USA yesterday that it has only just got approval from the Office of Management and Budget to conduct research into consumer understanding of whole grains (click here ).

A spokeswoman said: "The study will begin data collection in early 2014.  Analysis of data is expected to be finished by the fall of 2014."

In the meantime, a flurry of comments to the docket in the past few months shows key stakeholders disagree over key aspects of the draft guidance, from how to label whole grains, to what they are (click here ).

The word ‘grain’ in Latin (granum) means ‘seed’, so “whole grain simply means whole seed “

The 2006 document defines whole grains as “cereal grains that consist of the intact, ground, cracked or flaked fruit of the grains whose principal components - the starchy endosperm, germ and bran - are present in the same relative proportions as they exist in the intact grain.”

Such grains may include amaranth, barley, buckwheat, bulgur, corn (including popcorn), millet, quinoa, rice, rye, oats, sorghum, teff, triticale, wheat, and wild rice, says the FDA. But pearled barley, soybeans, chickpeas and other products derived from legumes, oilseeds and roots should not be considered whole grains.

 It is in the public interest to promote consumption of whole seeds…all whole seeds… versus refined or otherwise fractionated seeds

However, Dan Best, president of consultancy Best Vantage Inc - which has extensive experience of working with oilseeds, pulses and legumes - argues that this definition should be expanded to include whole-seed beans, peas, lentils, chickpeas, flaxseed, mustard, sesame, walnut, pine nut, almonds and other whole seeds.

He told FoodNavigator-USA: "I would include ANY whole seeds that include a pericarp in the end-use application. For some seeds (sunflower and soy), it is unlikely that the whole seed would be used, for practical reasons.The objective is to encourage the consumption of the entire seed. If the definition were to be limited to cereals and pseudo-cereals, then at minimum, it should include pulses (beans, chickpeas, lentils, peas) which include significant starch fractions.

 “The guiding principle behind developing whole-grain definitions should be based on nutritional, not taxonomic, considerations.”

Besides, the word ‘grain’ in Latin (granum) means ‘seed’, so “whole grain simply means whole seed”, he added, noting that if the FDA is concerned primarily about taxonomy, includingthe  ‘pseudo-cereals’ amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa in its whole grain definition isn’t entirely logical, as they are not from the grass family.

In fact they appear to be included because they are used in applications like cereal grains, in which case you could argue that many other seeds and legumes should also be included in the wholegrain definition, he said.

Guiding principle behind developing whole-grain definitions should be based on nutritional, not taxonomic, considerations

And if nutrition is the key, then seeds, pulses and legumes should be at the top of the list, given that flaxseed, chickpea or dry bean flours are more nutritionally rich than many cereal grains, he said.

"The only reason we’re interested in ‘whole grains’ is because the outer layers of the seed are a rich sources of nutrients and removing the bran during milling diminishes its nutritional value. But this is true for all seeds, not just cereal seeds. It is in the public interest to promote consumption of whole seeds…all whole seeds… versus refined or otherwise fractionated seeds.”

ADM: We respectfully disagree with FDA’s narrow definition of whole grain  

ADM: We respectfully disagree with FDA’s narrow definition of whole grain

And he is not alone.

In its comments in the docket ADM said it “respectfully disagree [s] with the agency's narrow definition of whole grain by exclusively focusing on cereal grains” and urged it to include ‘grain legumes’ such as soybeans, which it claimed are “characterized by a bran/seed coat, endosperm and germ” - just like cereal grains - and can also “be utilized also in a manner consistent with other grains”.

Meanwhile, the Northern Crops Institute, Flax Canada and AmeriFlax have also filed comments calling for 'whole grain flaxseed' to be included, with the latter alleging thatFDA has made an improper distinction of whole grain flaxseed by generally categorizing it as an ‘oilseed’ with no other health attributes.”

It added: “Indeed, the nutritional components of whole grain flaxseed compare exceedingly well with cereal grains such as corn, which, in the American diet, functions as much as an oilseed as it does a whole grain.”

There is still time for our industry to contribute to this debate

Dan Best: There is still time for our industry to contribute to this debate

But isn’t it a bit late in the day to be arguing over definitions?

No, argues Best, who said the FDA had told delegates at the AACCI Annual Meeting in October that it was still accepting comments (Kellogg, General Mills and the CSPI have all filed new comments in the past 6 months although the ‘official’ comment period ended in 2006).

He added: “There is still time for our industry to contribute to this debate. This is still an open question with major consequences for the food industry and consumers alike. Resolution of this issue will determine to what degree non-cereal seeds will be used in many of the new foods currently under development in the US.”

Whole Grains Council: Flax, chia are very healthy, but that doesn't mean they are whole grains

So what does the Whole Grains Council (WGC) think?

Cynthia Harriman: There are many wonderful, healthy foods and ingredients that certainly contribute to better nutrition, but that doesn't mean they are whole grains

Cynthia Harriman, director of food and nutrition strategies at the WGC and Oldways, does not agree with Best’s reasoning.

She told FoodNavigator-USA: “There are many wonderful, healthy foods and ingredients that certainly contribute to better nutrition, but that doesn't mean they are whole grains. The health benefits of whole grains are based on research that does not include oilseeds (flax, chia, sesame, etc.) or legumes/pulses (beans, lentils, soy).

“We're delighted that so many other foods want to climb on the whole grain bandwagon, but we don't think it's appropriate since the health research is tied to cereal grains and the three widely-accepted pseudo cereals (buckwheat, amaranth, and quinoa).

“Instead, we would suggest simply educating the public on the wonderful attributes of oilseeds and legumes so that everyone can appreciate that healthy foods come from many ingredients, not just from whole grains.”

Click here to read more about the areas of the whole grains labeling draft guidance up for debate.

Click here to read recent recent comments from General Mills and click here to read comments from Kellogg on whole grain labeling statements.

Click here to read the FDA's 2006 draft guidance.

3 comments (Comments are now closed)

regarding lupin

I looked at lupin on a product development project a while back. In the U.S., it is not considered GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe). When I looked into it, a company had filed for GRAS status and withdrawn the application. If I recall correctly, the concern had to do with documented allergenicity on the level of peanuts, which would greatly complicate labeling. I understand that there is a lot of confusing and conflicting information out there, so I would recommend anybody looking at using lupin to clarify this issue.

Report abuse

Posted by Daniel Best
13 December 2013 | 00h44

Whole grain claims based on research

Michael, I am always amazed that people want to include any kind of seed or legume in the whole grain cereal definition just because it's a seed. If you want to have a health claim for lupin or other kind of seed, then you need to collect a dossier of evidence that supports your claim. That is what has been done for whole grain cereals, and that is why you cannot just add any seed willy nilly into the definition.

It could be argued that the whole grain definition is too broad with regards to health claims, as they are based on observational data, and the main whole grains consumed in this case are wheat, oats and brown rice.

Report abuse

Posted by Alastair
06 December 2013 | 23h19

Whole grain

I am always amazed that there is never any mention of lupin grain. Lupin grain is considered an ancient whole grain loaded with health benefits.

Report abuse

Posted by Michael Unruh
06 December 2013 | 17h24

Related products

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...