Review claims rbST milk is eco-friendly and safe

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Milk

Milk from cows treated with the rbST hormone is not only identical to other milk, but is also more eco-friendly, says a scientific review sponsored by Elanco, the company that bought Monsanto’s rbST business last year.

In the 1930s, it was discovered that increasing levels of bovine somatotrophin (bST), a hormone produced naturally by lactating cows, led to greater milk volumes. Monsanto developed an artificial version – rbST –in 1994, and controversy has dogged the product ever since. Its use is banned in Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, although bulk milk products from rbST-treated cows can still be used in food manufacture. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved rbST for use in 1993.

Now a review of the scientific data on rbST – first presented at the Joint Annual Meeting of the American Dairy Science Association, Canadian Society of Animal Science, and American Society of Animal Science in July – has said that rbST is “one example of the kinds of efficient food production practices that will help feed the world in the future.”

Decreased land use

It says that US supplementation with rbST increases milk production by about 15 percent, therefore decreasing the amount of land needed to increase milk volumes. The report claims that using rbST hormones in 15 percent of US dairy cows “reduces the carbon footprint of milk production equal to taking approximately 390,000 cars off the road each yearor planting approximately 290 million trees annually.”


But one of the greatest areas of conflict in the US has been between Monsanto and dairy producers who do not use the firm’s rbST hormone, regarding the labeling of products to draw attention to their non-rbST origins.

Monsanto says on its website: “We are not against the accurate labeling of milk – even when it is labeled to state that rBST has not been used. Unfortunately in an effort to profit from unfounded fears, many milk processors have labeled their milk to suggest that milk from cows treated with rBST is harmful, or somehow different from milk from untreated cows.”

However, firms flagging up their milk as not containing the hormone say they want to provide consumers with the choice to make informed purchasing decisions.

This latest review backs up Monsanto’s position, saying: “The composition of all milk – organic, rbST-free and conventional – is indistinguishable.”

A full copy of the review can be found online here.

Related topics R&D Dairy-based ingredients

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

How to Make Plant-Based Better for You

How to Make Plant-Based Better for You

SweeGen | 24-Jan-2023 | Technical / White Paper

Plant-based food and beverage sales are booming, thanks to a growing desire among consumers for healthier food options, with sugar among the top ingredients...

Growing Up Bioactives

Growing Up Bioactives

Glanbia Nutritionals | 13-Sep-2022 | Business Advice

Parents are prioritizing their children’s health and wellness with 66% indicating they give their child nutritional supplements once a day*. Support their...

Opportunity Alert: Mobility Matters to your Consumers

Opportunity Alert: Mobility Matters to your Consumers

NZMP (Ingredients by Fonterra) | 16-Aug-2022 | Infographic

The World Health Organization says mobility is critical for healthy ageing, as it’s a core concern seniors face. With mobility’s significant impact on...

Consumers are ditching diets for intuitive eating.

Consumers are ditching diets for intuitive eating.

Fonterra | 02-Aug-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Interest in intuitive eating is reportedly gaining as much traction with consumers as the ketogenic diet. However, without similarly strict macronutrient...

Follow us


View more