New HFCS study stirs up obesity debate

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: High-fructose corn syrup, Sucrose, Obesity

A rat study from Princeton University has claimed that high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) consumption could play a major role in ballooning obesity rates – but some have challenged the study’s methodology.

The study compared weight gain over an eight-week period in rats given access to an eight percent HFCS solution 12 hours a day; rats given access to the same solution 24 hours a day; rats given access to a ten percent sucrose solution; and the weight of rats given ordinary chow alone.

They found that those fed the12 hour-HFCS solution were the only ones to show statistically significant weight gain, even though they consumed fewer calories than those given the sucrose solution. The authors did not give a clear reason for how this could be the case, but speculated that slightly higher fructose levels in HFCS than in sucrose could be to blame.

Sucrose contains 50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose, while the type of HFCS used in soft drinks contains 55 percent fructose and 42 percent glucose.

Psychology professor Dr Bart Hoebel said: “Some people have claimed that high-fructose corn syrup is no different than other sweeteners when it comes to weight gain and obesity, but our results make it clear that this just isn't true, at least under the conditions of our tests.”

Writing on her blog​, NYU nutrition expert Marion Nestle said she was skeptical about the study. She said: “How they came to these conclusions is beyond me.”

The conclusion she drew from the study was: “So does HFCS make rats fat? Sure if you feed them too many calories altogether. Sucrose will do that, too.”

The Center for Consumer Freedom was surprised to find that it agreed with Marion Nestle, who it has described as “one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics.”

“Marion Nestle has shed some perspective and analysis on this research,”​ the organization said in a statement.

The Corn Refiners Association has long argued that HFCS and sugar are handled in the same way by the body. Responding to the Princeton study, CRA president Audrae Erickson said: “This study unnecessarily confuses consumers about human metabolism of common sugars in the diet. A sugar is a sugar whether it comes from cane, corn, or beets…No metabolic effects have been found in studies that compare sugar and high fructose corn syrup consumption in humans.”

The Princeton study can be accessed here​.

Fears about HFCS were raised in 2004, when an article was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition​ hypothesizing that the sweetener could be linked to rising rates of obesity. One of the article’s authors Dr Barry Popkin has since said that he was wrong to pinpoint HFCS as obesity’s major cause, but consumer concern has continued nonetheless.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more


Pectin's "a-peeling" future

Cargill | 08-Aug-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Familiar, plant-based, highly functional… today's pectin ticks off a lot of boxes for consumers and product developers alike. Learn how this humble...

Sustainable sweetness

Sustainable sweetness

Cargill | 04-Aug-2022 | Insight Guide

According to proprietary Cargill research, more than half of consumers indicate they are more likely to purchase a product if it includes a sustainability...

Lower carbon flour sourcing solutions.

Lower carbon flour sourcing solutions.

ADM | 28-Jul-2022 | Insight Guide

As more stakeholders demand action that can slow climate change, we can help you calculate and reduce GHG emissions from farm to flour.

Leading the way to less sugar

Leading the way to less sugar

Cargill | 15-Jun-2022 | Infographic

Meeting consumer expectations for less sugar isn't always easy – due to its many functions and complex attitudes toward alternative sweeteners.

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more