WTO sides with Canada on US meat country of origin labeling

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: United states, International trade

WTO sides with Canada on US meat country of origin labeling
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has ruled that US policy on country of origin labeling violates international trade rules by creating barriers to free trade, including with Canada and Mexico.

The WTO panel agreed that the United States has the right to require country of origin labeling, as long as it is to provide consumers with information, and not for protectionist reasons. However, it found that current COOL requirements afford less favorable treatment to imported livestock than domestic livestock, and that the policy “does not fulfill the objective of providing consumer information on origin with respect to meat products”.

Responding to the WTO announcement, press secretary for the Office of the US Trade Representative Andrea Mead said in a statement: “We are pleased that the panel affirmed the right of the United States to require country of origin labeling for meat products.

“Although the panel disagreed with the specifics of how the United States designed those requirements, we remain committed to providing consumers with accurate and relevant information with respect to the origin of meat products that they buy at the retail level. In that regard we are considering all options, including appealing the panel’s decision.”

The Canadian government said that US COOL measures have forced Canadian exports to go through a lengthy labeling and tracking system, which it claims has led to the disintegration of the North American supply chain. Under the system, US meat processors have been required to handle and label Canadian products separately, leading many of them to simply exclude Canadian products. Moreover, Canadian producers have said that the rules have produced a glut on local markets, thereby depressing prices.

Canada’s minister of international trade Ed Fast welcomed the WTO decision.

He said: “This decision recognizes the integrated nature of the North American supply chain in this vitally important industry. Removing onerous labeling measures and unfair, unnecessary costs will improve competitiveness, boost growth and help strengthen the prosperity of Canadian and American producers alike.”

The United States is Canada’s biggest export market for cattle and hogs, and Canada said its cattle exports were down 23% and hog exports were down 34% from 2007 to 2009.

Canada first requested WTO involvement in December 2008, alleging that the COOL system had damaged its export market.

Country of origin labeling is required on all beef, chicken, pork, lamb, goat, and fish sold at US grocery stores, as well as on perishable agricultural commodities, ginseng, macadamias, pecans and peanuts.

The United States has 60 days in which it can file an appeal with the WTO.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Savory Flavors that Transform the Culinary Experience

Savory Flavors that Transform the Culinary Experience

ADM: Gain an Edge with Global Consumer Trends | 07-Nov-2022 | Infographic

Uncover the countless delicious ways ADM can help you create crave-worthy products with our chef-inspired savory flavor portfolio. Deliciousness starts...

Our supply chain delivers your climate goals.

Our supply chain delivers your climate goals.

ADM | 25-Oct-2022 | Product Brochure

We put food on tables the world over. So, we’re investing in building a more sustainable supply chain. Our supply chain starts with regenerative agriculture...

Related suppliers

5 comments

Show more

Organic, by any other name.....

Posted by Lydia Freund,

Organic in one country may mean nothing in another. I eat USDA organic because I know what it means. Farm practices differ widely from country to country. Ever wonder why so many countries don't want American beef? Because we feed GMO corn and GMO soy to our commercially grown cows. Labelling matters. Let's hope it gets even more specific.

Report abuse

The Public Does Have a Right To Know

Posted by Jon Yaffe,

It's good to learn that the US government is dedicated to the public's right to know about food sourcing.
I understand this information needs to come from the top down, but the WTO is right in recognizing that the info most often doesn't reach the consumer. A broken chain is useless regardless of where the bad or missing link lies.
I'll have more faith in the government when it mandates comprehensive consumer-level labeling - which to my mind must include GMO component identification.
It would be interesting to poll consumers on their priorities for labeling. I believe studies have shown something like 90% of the responding public wants GMO labeling.

Report abuse

Consumer Rights

Posted by Susan,

COOL was enacted per the consumer right to know as stated in the previous comment. Americans are still waiting for fulfillment of Obama's promise on the labeling of genetically modified foods. I wonder how this decision will impact EU countries who require GMO labeling?

Report abuse

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars