BI Chief: I don’t think we’ll see government mandated GMO labeling; It’s a marketing issue.


- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Gmo labeling Genetically modified organism

From California to Washington, and from Connecticut to Vermont, initiatives to label the presence of ingredients derived from genetically modified foods are dominating headlines. Despite this, the CEO of BI Nutraceuticals doesn’t think we’ll see government mandated GMO labeling.

Speaking with FoodNavigator-USA at the recent IFT Annual Meeting and Expo in Chicago, George Pontiakos said: “I don’t think we’ll see government mandated GMO labeling,”​ said Pontiakos. “I don’t think the FDA views it as unsafe. I think it will be a marketing issue. I think consumers in many demographics are going to want non-GMO product, and retailers like Whole Foods will service that customer base.

“The mass market guys will wait and see, I think. Are the customers going to pay an upcharge for a non-GMO product or not?”

Concerns about a patchwork effect if different states introduce GMO labeling initiatives are similar to the effects of Prop 65 from California, he said. “Prop 65 is a singular California issue that affects the other 49 states. People cannot afford to have multiple skus for multiple states to make sure that product is not in non-compliance with state law. It’s going to be a logistics challenge internal in operations to support GMO and non-GMO products.”

The issue

Pontiakos noted that the challenge for the issue is, in his opinion, about the definition, how do you define a genetically modified product?

“I think it’s a media issue. It makes a good topic. People are interested in it. They want to have healthy food. They don’t want to have a situation where they’re ingesting isn’t safe.

“Is it truly bad for you? I haven’t seen any definite studies – at least in my landscape – that have shown it to be detrimental, and the FDA hasn’t either, obviously, or they would have done something about it.”

“A lot of the industry on the GMO side has not done a very good job in educating the consumer. You need genetically modified foods from a pesticide perspective to reduce that. You need it from a yield perspective because you have a lot of hungry people in this world.”

From a business perspective, Pontiakos said that BI has received “a tremendous amount of interest [from customers]. We’re looking at a number of suppliers that have non-GMO fields. It very much parallels the organic market: You have to find a field that is certifiable non-GMO or organic, and then hope that the field is managed to maintain that integrity.”

Related products

show more

Replacement Isn't the Future. Variety Is.

Replacement Isn't the Future. Variety Is.

Content provided by ADM | 22-Mar-2024 | White Paper

Successfully navigating the intersection of food and technology can help your business meet evolving consumer demands.

Some home truths about real prebiotic dietary fibre

Some home truths about real prebiotic dietary fibre

Content provided by BENEO | 22-Mar-2024 | Product Presentation

Confused about prebiotics? You’re not the only one! Food developers wanting to work with prebiotic dietary fibre are faced with an abundance of products...

Consumer Attitudes on Ultra-Processed Foods Revealed

Consumer Attitudes on Ultra-Processed Foods Revealed

Content provided by Ayana Bio | 12-Jan-2024 | White Paper

Ayana Bio conducted the Ultra-Processed Food (UPF) Pulse survey, offering insight into consumers’ willingness to consume UPFs, as well as the variables...

Future Food-Tech San Francisco, March 21-22, 2024

Future Food-Tech San Francisco, March 21-22, 2024

Content provided by Rethink Events Ltd | 11-Jan-2024 | Event Programme

Future Food-Tech is the go-to meeting place for the food-tech industry to collaborate towards a healthier food system for people and planet.

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more