Class-action baked bread lawsuit dismissed against Whole Foods and other grocers

By Hal Conick

- Last updated on GMT

Claims of Whole Foods and two other grocers misleading consumers were too vague for a New Jersey judge. Stock picture.
Claims of Whole Foods and two other grocers misleading consumers were too vague for a New Jersey judge. Stock picture.

Related tags United states Grocery store

Three class-action lawsuits claiming grocers fooled shoppers into believing bread was freshly made in stores were dismissed by a United States District Court judge last week.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Irenas​, of the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, said the claims against Whole Foods Markets Inc., Acme Markets Inc. and Wegmans Food Markets Inc., in the lawsuits were too vague.

There were claims that the grocery stores misrepresented various bread and bakery products as being fresh baked in the store that were actually frozen, processed or baked in another location. Plaintiffs claimed that this was in violation of multiple New Jersey laws.

Specifically, the Whole Foods case claimed signs like “MADE IN HOUSE BREAD”​ and “FRESHLY BOILED & PLAIN BAGEL”​ were tricking shoppers into buying what they believed was a product made fresh in the store.

The decision

Irenas wrote that he was dismissing claims because they were too vague and the plaintiffs did not show that they overpaid for the bread products.

“Defendants’ stores contain numerous bread and bakery products,” ​Irenas wrote. “The signs advertising such products change often. This is not a case in which all relevant items were stamped ‘freshly baked.’”

Ireans said there was not enough “precision” in the complaint to put any of the grocers on notice for the claims, as there was no real notice of which signs or advertisements were misrepresented.

No real loss

Irenas said the plaintiffs didn’t demonstrate where they experienced any real loss, as they said they “would not have purchased the bread and bakery products, would not have paid as much for the products or would have purchased alternative products,”​ instead of the bread.

The plaintiffs never stated which products they bought or the prices they paid, so the judge could not see a reason to award them any money for out-of-pocket losses.

Related news

Related products

show more

Functional Benefits in Sports Nutrition

Functional Benefits in Sports Nutrition

ADM | Recorded the 12-May-2022 | Webinar

Sports nutrition is not just for high-level athletes anymore, but for a broader set of active consumers who are seeking nutrition for both physical and...

Protein demand drives development in products

Protein demand drives development in products

Glanbia Nutritionals | 06-Apr-2022 | Sponsored Link

As consumers seek out more protein packed snacking and breakfast options, provide them with an exceptionally delightful eating experience.

Healthy, delicious and sustainable

Healthy, delicious and sustainable

Döhler – Natural Food & Beverage Ingredients | 25-Mar-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Looking for best in class plant-based taste innovation? Partner with Doehler’s global team of plant-based experts, to overcome development challenges...

1 comment

Oh those marketing guys....

Posted by Dean,

Always looking for new ways to bring in the dough...

Report abuse

Follow us


View more