Regulatory shifts dominate food policy news this week

Policymakers are revisiting foundational frameworks – from defining the foods Americans eat every day, to managing the workforce that brings those foods to market, to rethinking how new ingredients are deemed safe. FDA is asking for more input on what counts as an ultra-processed food. The agency has extended the public comment period by 30 days, pushing the deadline to Oct. 23. The request for information stems from the Department of Health and Human Services’ ongoing initiative to create a federal definition of UPFs. While no single definition exists today, the issue is drawing more attention as policymakers, researchers and advocacy groups debate whether UPFs are linked to negative health outcomes. Industry stakeholders have warned against moving too quickly or drawing the definition too narrowly. Several trade groups argue that a rigid framework could unintentionally hinder innovation and restrict consumer access to convenient, affordable products. For now, the extension provides companies, public health advocates, and researchers additional time to weigh in on a policy that could have far-reaching implications across labeling, marketing and product development. Read the full story here: FDA advances work on ultra-processed foods, allergens and food dyes Labor shortages remain one of the most pressing challenges for US agriculture, and a recent move by the Trump administration aims to provide some relief. The federal government has waived in-person interview requirements for H-2A visa renewals, provided the renewal falls within 12 months of expiration. Growers have long pointed to the H-2A program as essential for ensuring a stable farm labor supply, especially during peak harvest periods. But the system also has been criticized for its complexity and delays. By removing one administrative step, the State Department hopes to speed up approvals and reduce disruptions for farmers relying on experienced seasonal workers. Still, industry groups see this as a stopgap measure rather than a long-term solution. Calls for broader immigration reform remain loud, as many stakeholders argue the US food system needs on policies that create stability and predictability for the agricultural workforce. Read the full story here: Trump administration lifts hurdles for immigrant farmworkers as harvest season peaks FDA’s GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) system – the foundation for determining the safety of food ingredients – is also under review. The agency is considering sweeping changes that could require companies to seek premarket approval rather than relying on self-affirmed GRAS determinations. Other possible reforms include mandatory post-market re-evaluations of ingredients and greater transparency around safety data. For consumer packaged goods companies, the implications are significant. The current GRAS system has long been criticized by consumer advocacy groups for being too opaque, while industry has favored its flexibility. A more stringent approach could mean longer timelines, additional costs and heightened scrutiny for ingredient innovation – but it may also bolster consumer trust. Read the full story here: GRAS under the microscope: FDA eyes reform as consumer trust waivers

Regulatory shifts dominate food policy news this week

For food and beverage companies, staying ahead of these shifts will be critical as the rules of the game continue to evolve

Related Topics

UPF litigation: What brands need to know now

California’s UPF school ban heads to Gov. Newsom’s desk, sparks divided reactions

Three states propose laws targeting GRAS, while more than 100 more bills aim to block controversial additives