Scientists question benefits of polyphenols

By Stephen Daniells

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Antioxidant, Clinical trial

Polyphenols, antioxidants linked to a long list of health benefits,
may not be so good for you when taken in larger doses found in
supplements and foritified foods, researchers have said.

The beneficial health effects of polyphenols from green tea, berries, olive oil, cereals and a wide range of other foods have been heavily linked to a preventive role for the main chronic diseases such as cardiovascular, cancer, and all inflammatory diseases. The majority of specialists agree that a high consumption of polyphenols can decrease and prevent all these diseases. However, some concerns have been raised in a new article published in the American Chemical Society's journal Chemical Research in Toxicology.​ Scientists from Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey state: "Although consumption of dietary phytochemicals such as flavonoids has been suggested to have beneficial biological effects. Including the prevention of cancer and heart disease, there is considerable evidence to suggest that such compounds are not without risk of adverse effects. "The risk of adverse effects is likely increased by the use of pharmacological doses in prevention/treatment and supplement situations… that may increase the bioavailability of test compounds." ​ The article by Joshua Lambert, Shengmin Sang and Chung Yang has been called paper science with no real world value by Daniel Fabricant, PhD, vice president, scientific and regulatory affairs at US-based trade association The Natural Products Association (NPA). Lambert and co-workers reviewed in vitro​ and in vivo​ studies for a wide range of polyphenols, particularly epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and other green tea polyphenols, and genistein from soy. They quote studies that report an apparent pro-oxidant effect of the polyphenols. Such an effect would increase oxidative stress at a cellular level and increase the risk of disease. "Despite several human studies that showed no toxicity of tea polyphenol preparations and that the major adverse effects associated with consumption of high doses of tea preparations are due to gastrointestinal irritation, there have been a number of recent case reports of hepatotoxicity [liver toxicity] related to the consumption of high doses of tea-based dietary supplements (10-29 mg/kg/day),"​ wrote Lambert. "Although there have been no reports of toxicity in human volunteers enrolled in intervention studies, careful monitoring of liver and kidney function is required until the risk of toxic events associated with tea catechins is established in humans,"​ he added. This point was seized on by Dr. Fabricant, who told "For every onein vivoorin vitropaper on pro-oxidant risk there are thousands on anti-oxidant benefit, more importantly, all thein vitroandin vivodata in the world does not take the place of what we know from clinical research, which is available in droves on polyphenolic extracts, especially green tea and some of the pure compounds referenced in the paper, these extracts and compounds have not demonstrated an increased risk in trials."​ Fabricant stressed that, contrary to the authors' claims to the contrary on-going clinical trials do include protocols to assess potential adverse events, (good clinical practice guidelines), and that adverse events are essentially non-existent in trials of green tea, and some of the other compounds and extracts cited in the study. "The authors lumpin vivoandin vitrodata together, lump experiments on different animal species together, lump different routes of administration together to draw a broad conclusion about potential toxicity, when they have no substance to do such," he said. "Solid scientific evaluation of toxicity involves two steps: hazard identification and dose-response evaluation, the authors do neither and should demonstrate some scientific responsibility and refrain from speculating on toxicity."​ It would appear that Lambert, Sang and Yang's comment could merely be a storm in a teacup. Source: Chemical Research in Toxicology​ 2007, Volume 20, Pages 583-585 "Possible controversy over dietary polyphenols: Benefits vs risks" ​Authors: J. Lambert, S. Sang and C.S. Yang

Related topics: Health and nutritional ingredients

Related news

Related products

show more

ADM Sustainability & Integrated Supply Chain

ADM Sustainability & Integrated Supply Chain

ADM: Gain an Edge with Global Consumer Trends | 07-Nov-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Wondering how to meet your climate goals? Find out how through increased investment in regenerative agriculture and other programs ADM can help you reduce...

2023 Global Consumer Trends Report

2023 Global Consumer Trends Report

ADM: Gain an Edge with Global Consumer Trends | 07-Nov-2022 | Insight Guide

Are you keeping up with the latest consumer trends? Uncover the 8 key global growth drivers shaping the future of innovation in ADM’s 3rd Annual Global...

Great mouth feel with plant-based appeal

Great mouth feel with plant-based appeal

ADM | 26-Oct-2022 | Case Study

Put Stabrium™ to work for you. After extensive development comes our Stabrium™ portfolio with the body, thickness and mouthfeel consumers expect in dairy...

Our supply chain delivers your climate goals.

Our supply chain delivers your climate goals.

ADM | 25-Oct-2022 | Product Brochure

We put food on tables the world over. So, we’re investing in building a more sustainable supply chain. Our supply chain starts with regenerative agriculture...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more