Industry should promote meat and dairy substitutes ‘like digital technology’, says ex-World Bank adviser

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Milk

Industry should promote meat and dairy substitutes ‘like digital technology’, says ex-World Bank adviser
The food industry could promote meat and dairy substitutes ‘like digital technology’ to tackle climate change, suggests former World Bank environmental adviser Robert Goodland.

Goodland was one of two World Bank environmental advisers who co-authored a 2009 World Watch report​ arguing that the emissions produced in the lifecycle and supply chain of livestock could account for as much as 51% of total greenhouse gas emissions. Figures estimating livestock’s contribution to total emissions vary widely, from a proportion of about 10% to World Watch’s 51%. The most commonly cited figure is the 18% indicated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in a 2006 report “Livestock’s Long Shadow”.

“Like digital technology, meat anddairy substitutes can deliver better quality at lower cost, while fulfilling the world's priority of preventing climate disruption,”​ Goodland wrote in a blog post​ for a new website underpinned by the World Watch report’s conclusions.

“From a food industry perspective, meat and dairy substitutes can be promoted like digital technology,”​ he wrote. “Within a decade, manufacturers have switched almost entirely from analog televisions and telephones to digital versions – propelled by savings in materials and energy use, along with other improvements.”

Development of new meat analog products has accelerated in recent years, with some of the most promising alternatives based on plant proteins, such as soy and peas, and the dairy substitutes market has also expanded.

According to a recent report from market research organization Packaged Facts, consumption of dairy alternative beverages reached $1.33bn last year and is growing rapidly. Meanwhile, USDA figures suggest that average per capita consumption of cow’s milk has fallen from 24.3 gallons per person in 1994 to 20.8 gallons per person in 2008.

“From a consumer perspective, the required change can be made by people who would scarcely notice the difference in replacing carbon-intensive meat and dairy products with substitutes such as seitan-based ‘chicken’, soy-based ‘beef’, nut-based milks, and coconut-based ice cream,”​ Goodland wrote.

“People may not recognize it, but their food habits are greatly induced by marketing, which today promote meat and dairy products strenuously.  Yet marketing can promote alternatives instead, and trying tasty new foods is normally considered desirable.”

Goodland claims that allowing forest to regenerate on just a quarter of the land currently used for grazing livestock could be a “single, powerful action to reverse climate change quickly”.

Related news

Related products

show more

Consumers are ditching diets for intuitive eating.

Consumers are ditching diets for intuitive eating.

Fonterra | 02-Aug-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Interest in intuitive eating is reportedly gaining as much traction with consumers as the ketogenic diet. However, without similarly strict macronutrient...

Fonterra Keeps Your Ingredients Ahead of the Curve

Fonterra Keeps Your Ingredients Ahead of the Curve

Fonterra | 26-Jul-2022 | Technical / White Paper

With health and environmental concerns in mind, consumers’ commitment to purchasing organic products continues to grow. Whether your brand is starting...

¡Por qué WB47 podría ser su próximo acierto!

¡Por qué WB47 podría ser su próximo acierto!

Sidel Group | 19-May-2022 | Product Presentation

Con una mayor flexibilidad a nivel de empaque primario y secundario, la plataforma de empaque mejorada WB47 responde a las expectativas de diversas categorías...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Agreed! But...

Posted by Jennifer Christiano,

As a former meat-n-taters gal who was given the option of choice by some friends in college and decided to make the switch for ethical, health and environmental concerns - and who has enjoyed a wide variety of "substitutes" ever since - I agree wholeheartedly! HOWEVER, the new products MUST be "clean" (organic definitely preferred, and free of MSG, processed sugars, additives and so on), genuinely tasty, and naturally nutritious. I've discovered, over the period of 25 years, that even devout meat eaters will scarf up vegan foods before touching meat at a buffet IF the vegan food is of high quality, nicely prepared and attractively presented.
Coercion, deception and pressure tactics must not be used to "convince" people to switch. But give most individuals a clearly delicious, respectful choice that makes them feel happier and healthier after they eat - and do it with a positive attitude at a competitive price - and their stomachs will automatically make the right decisions.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more