Consumer groups urge government to issue overdue FSMA regulations

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Foodborne illness, Food safety, President of the united states

Consumer groups urge government to issue overdue FSMA regulations
A coalition of consumer groups has urged the US government to issue regulations that have not met statutory deadlines under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).

President Obama signed FSMA into law on January 4, 2011. Having attracted broad bipartisan support, the law was touted as the biggest overhaul of US food safety legislation in 70 years. However, the coalition of consumer groups that helped drive FSMA’s passage has accused the Obama administration of stalling on issuing key draft rules.

Among those groups is the Pew Health Group, which said on its website: “Despite bipartisan support, and a coalition of food safety advocates and industry representatives working for its enactment, the administration still has not issued the proposed rules needed to begin implementing this law.”

Other organizations joining the call to action included STOP Foodborne Illness, Center for Science in the Public Interest and Food and Water Watch.

Along with families of victims of foodborne illness, they sent a letter to the Obama administration on Tuesday, which states: “We are now concerned and deeply disappointed because crucial food-safety protection proposals that would give life to FSMA have been languishing in White House review for more than six months, well after they were supposed to be issued under the new law. We remain puzzled by your Administration's failure to put in place these important protections that you so strongly supported.”

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which normally has 90 days to review regulations, has not given a reason for the hold-up.

Draft regulations on establishing a foreign supplier verification program and produce safety guidance are among those that are more than six months behind schedule.

The coalition warned that without enforcement of FSMA, the FDA would not be able to implement promised prevention-based protections, putting more Americans at risk of illness and death from foodborne pathogens.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 48m Americans become ill as a result of foodborne illness each year, 125,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

How an ERP Helps Your Food & Beverage Company Win

How an ERP Helps Your Food & Beverage Company Win

Aptean | 21-Apr-2021 | Technical / White Paper

From regulations to consumer demands, how do food and beverage companies keep up and make a profit in a highly competitive market?
Enterprise Resource...

Related suppliers

1 comment

95% of FSMA is already in place

Posted by Ben Mark,

The point is none of the big food organizations and their member wants FSMA. You never read anything in the food press about FSMA. It’s like none existed. It is all about labeling and that is only 5% of FSMA at the most.

Fact is the FDA has already all the power needed if their field staff would know about and enforce it:

Access to all records including sanitation and prevention records for all handlers from field to fork
Recall of unsafe or unsanitary food or feed for human or animals
Inspections at any time and warning letters.


They are still waiting until an incident happens until they act. Growers and packer/shippers/brokers think that a certification is all they need, how wrong they are. FDA does not use certifications as it’s a third party opinion requested by a retailer and it’s only for a day or two inspections.





The only thing missing are some new GAP rules, but there are enough GAP rules already in place to follow. What’s the problem? The problem is like with every law that’s not enforced; nothing will be done in this case for food safety.

Report abuse

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars