Coffee fans don’t ‘chug it down’: Health pros warn FDA on energy drinks

By Ben BOUCKLEY contact

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Energy drinks, Coffee, Caffeine

Coffee is 'consumed slowly by sipping' unlike energy drinks, according to the public health professionals' letter
Coffee is 'consumed slowly by sipping' unlike energy drinks, according to the public health professionals' letter
Despite industry claims energy drinks contain no more caffeine than Starbucks coffee, a group of top US health professionals tells the FDA energy caffeine content differs in ‘three important ways’ and says the agency should apply GRAS standards for soda to added-caffeine energy drinks.

The American Beverage Association disagrees, and a spokeswoman told BeverageDaily.com: “Most energy drinks contain about half the caffeine of a similarly-sized cup of coffeehouse coffee and the body of scientific evidence does not suggest that energy drinks cause adverse health outcomes.”

In their Tuesday letter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner, Margaret Hamburg, the doctors referred to scientific, political and consumer concern on the safety of what they described as “highly caffeinated energy drinks”​.

(Largest US energy manufacturer Monster Energy recently claimed via its attorney that a 16oz can contains only 160mg of caffeine, roughly half that of a 16oz cup of coffeehouse-brewed coffee (330mg)).

“As researchers, scientists, clinicians, and public health professionals who have studied and conducted research on energy drinks, we are writing this letter to summarize the scientific evidence on this issue and encourage action,” ​the 18 signatories state.

Monster Energy in crosshairs...again

They include Amelia Arria (University of Maryland School of Public Health) Mary Claire O’Brien (Wake Forest School of Medicine), Roland Griffiths (John Hopkins University School of Medicine).

The professionals used their own research and scientific papers to assess caffeine levels in energy drinks, links to fatalities and injuries, emergency visits, cardiovascular problems, seizures, childhood obesity, and assess the risks of combining energy drinks with alcohol, as well as other health issues.

Thus, they claim there is “neither sufficient evidence of safety nor a consensus of scientific opinion to conclude that the high levels of added caffeine in energy drinks are safe under the conditions of intended use, as required by the FDA’s Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) standards for food additives”.

The scientists cite 2012 FDA data to claim that, in general, caffeine concentrations in energy drinks are much higher than that of sodas (GRAS limit 71mg/12oz serving) compared with 160-240mg of caffeine per can for “most popular energy drinks like Monster Energy”.

“Although some brands of coffee contain amounts of caffeine that exceed the FDA’s established GRAS levels for soda, energy drinks differ from coffee in three important ways,”​ they write.

Marketed to 'pound down': Letter

Firstly, the caffeine in coffee occurred naturally, they wrote, while caffeine in energy drinks was added by manufacturers and was thus subject to regulation by the FDA as a food additive.

Second, many energy drinks and related products contained added caffeine that exceeded the caffeine concentration of even the most caffeinated coffee, the doctors added.

“Thirdly, coffee is typically served hot, tastes bitter, and is consumed slowly by sipping. By contrast, energy drinks are typically carbonated, sweetened drinks that are served cold and consumed more rapidly,” ​they wrote.

“Indeed, energy drinks are often marketed in a manner that encourages consumers to ingest large quantities quickly (e.g. ‘pound down’, ‘chug it down’).

Unlike coffee, energy drinks were marketed to appeal to youth, the scientists added, citing a National Institute of Health-​funded scientific review that concluded that this factor increased the risk of a drink overdose for this group, especially given the “risk-taking tendencies of adolescents”.

You can read the letter to Commissioner Hamburg here

Related news

Related products

show more

Maximize supply chain visibility with Muddy Boots

Maximize supply chain visibility with Muddy Boots

TELUS Agriculture | 15-Dec-2020 | Product Brochure

Muddy Boots’ Greenlight Supplier Management helps food manufacturers, processors and retailers boost product quality, reduce waste and delight customers.

Big surprises in Ipsos survey of 6000 flexitarians

Big surprises in Ipsos survey of 6000 flexitarians

IFF (formerly DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences) | 30-Nov-2020 | Technical / White Paper

Flexitarians in 9 countries give a meal-by-meal account of their preferences. Discover what it takes to make plant-based part of every meal in our groundbreaking...

Product Recovery (Pigging) for Food Manufacturers

Product Recovery (Pigging) for Food Manufacturers

HPS Product Recovery Solutions | 25-Nov-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Sanitary product recovery ("pigging") is in wide use by food manufacturers that pump liquids or wet products.
It gives a high ROI and...

Celery Juice and the Health-Conscious Consumer

Celery Juice and the Health-Conscious Consumer

Florida Food Products | 25-Oct-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Celery juice is an on-trend beverage ingredient with sought-after health benefits. Given its popularity, it’s no surprise that celery juice is showing...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more