Campbell Soup Co.’s GMO disclosure could serve as model for national label

By Elizabeth Crawford contact

- Last updated on GMT

Source: iStock
Source: iStock

Related tags: Label

Drawing on extensive consumer research, The Campbell Soup Co.’s GMO disclosure labels on packs and online could serve as a model for USDA in crafting the mandatory national bioengineering label standard and other companies looking for solutions.

Legislation passed and signed into law last July​ as an amendment to the Agricultural Marketing Act spared food and manufacturers from complying with Vermont’s GMO labeling law and the inevitable patchwork of state standards that would have followed, but in exchange it mandated that within two years the US Department of Agriculture would create a “national mandatory bioengineered food disclosure standard.” 

As the halfway point for defining that standard nears, USDA has yet to publicly state what bioengineering means and whether it will include “new”​ GMO techniques. Nor has the agency determined the specific language companies should use in the disclosures, the form of the disclosure or where it should appear.

The influence of the disclosures will differ dramatically based on whether USDA decides they should appear on packages or online, as a simple statement or as a QR code linking to a Smart Label online with detailed information.

As one of the leading players in the food and beverage space to already print short GMO disclosures on packaging and provide more details online in the form of Smart Labels. The Campbell Soup Co. is “working very closely with USDA and FDA on the best, consumer-friendly labeling for GMOs,”​ Jeff George, vice president of Americas research and development at Campbell Soup Co., told attendees at USDA’s Agricultural Outlook Forum in Washington, DC, Feb. 24.

He added, “I am confident, very confident, that we will find a solution that will work for all parties – for USDA, for FDA, for Campbell’s and for companies, and most importantly for our consumers.”

Lessons learned for creating GMO disclosures

While he did not say specifically the direction in which USDA is leaning, he noted that extensive consumer research conducted by Campbell’s to create its GMO label disclosures found consumers “expect to get this information in a variety of ways and have it easily accessible, including via digital methods”​ and on the package.

He explained that qualitative and quantitative research conducted by Campbell’s on “literally thousands of consumers to get their reaction to the best way to get this GMO communication out”​ revealed that “they want the on-pack message to be concise with the opportunity for them to get deeper information and other information via other methods, like Smart Label or [Campbell’s informational website] whatsinourfood.com.”

The company also found that “consumers like simple and familiar language that they can understand.”​ As such, George said the generic but safe disclaimer that an item could be “partially produced with GMOs”​ was “unsatisfying to consumers”​ and made them feel like the company was “hiding something with language like that.”

Along those same lines, Campbell’s research found consumers want to know the specific ingredients that are genetically modified, such as the corn, soy or sugar, and why the company chose to use them, George said.

Finally, he said the primary focus of the disclosures is to inform, not “frighten, mislead or confuse consumers.”

Companies must communicate GMOs are safe

This message must be reinforced by companies beyond just what is in disclosures, George said. He emphasized: “First and foremost, let’s start with the position that GMOs are safe. There are lots of consumer advocacy groups and even food manufacturers that would tend to have you believe that GMOs are not safe and should be eliminated. That is not our position.”

He explained that Campbell’s plans to continue to use GMO ingredients and has no major reformulations specifically planned to avoid using GMO.

“Now, that being said, we are opportunists, and we have products in our portfolio today that do not contain GMOs and if consumers like them and they buy more we are going to make more of them and develop more of the because that is good for business and serving our consumers,”​ he said. “But, there is no intent on our part to go back and reformulate GMOs out of the current portfolio.”

 

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

993_Of note_web image_610x343

Regulatory horizon scanning: what you need to know

Leatherhead Food Research | 12-Jun-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Understanding forthcoming and proposed food and beverage legislation is critical for informed decision making. But what about the future developments that...

Clean-label sodium and sugar reduction solution

Clean-label sodium and sugar reduction solution

Salt Of The Earth LTD | 04-Jun-2018 | Application Note

Use Mediterranean Umami to help dramatically decrease sodium and sugar levels – and add great taste!

• Simple and consumer-friendly ingredients:...

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Tereos Starch & Sweeteners Europe | 25-May-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Tereos has launched a range of delicious, 100% plant-based solutions for the food industry. Sauté Végétal is the first example of this new range of high-protein...

GLOBAL PREFERENCES: TEXTURANTS PLAY A KEY ROLE.

GLOBAL PREFERENCES: TEXTURANTS PLAY A KEY ROLE.

Tate and Lyle | 16-May-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Texture is a matter of taste, and that’s true on a global scale as well. What appeals to consumers in Italy might turn off those in Indonesia. As formulators,...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars